What now? The Outlook.

First quarter economic outlook—reflects the fallout from the last quarter

The first quarter’s economic performance will reflect many of the forces created at the end of 2018. These forces included: the sharp equity market decline near year end which tightened financial conditions resulting in the Fed moving to a more dovish monetary policy, the uncertain outcome of the Sino-U.S. trade war, the fourth quarter inventory build to beat expected January tariff increases, and the partial closing of the U.S. government. At this point, the Atlanta Fed’s blue-chip economist forecasts call for first quarter GDP growth to average 1.5%. In comparison, the Atlanta Fed’s “GDP now” forecast projects growth below 1%. The remainder of this commentary will primarily examine how these fourth quarter forces will influence economic growth in 2019.

 

Quarterly pattern

Historically, in part due to seasonal adjustment factors, the first quarter GDP growth shows a significantly smaller contribution than the following quarters (see figure 1.) Admittedly, the nearly decade long economic growth helped create the consistency of that seasonal pattern. The 2019 quarterly GDP forecast from Oxford Economics mimics that pattern (see figure 2.) Overall, most economists look for the 2019 GDP annual growth rate to come in somewhat above the economy’s potential growth rate of nearly 2%.

That growth rate would compare to 3.1% last year—4q/4q.

Figure 1

Seasonality of U.S. economic growth: Average GDP growth by quarter—2010-2018

Source: Suntrust Advisory Services

 

Figure 2

U.S. real GDP growth by quarter (percent change)

Source: Oxford Economics, Daily Shot

 

U.S. consumers key to domestic and global growth

Stock market decline depressed end-of-the year retail sales

The year-end stock market selloff likely depressed fourth quarter household net worth. In that quarter, net worth experienced the sharpest decline, 3.5%, since the global financial crisis (see figure 3.) According to a recent article in The Washington Post, the top 10% of families own about 84% of the stock market. Therefore, in our view, the market decline likely caused many of these families to hold back on their holiday spending. If so, it helped contribute to lower retail sales in December.

Figure 3

Households and non-profit organizations net worth (Percent change quarterly—not seasonally adjusted)

 

U.S. consumers bigger than China

The rate of consumer spending recovery in 2019 will not only determine U.S. economic growth for the remainder of the year but also global growth as well. Figure 4 pictures the fact that U.S. consumer spending alone contributes a greater share to world GDP than any individual country.

Figure 4

Share of world GDP—2018

 

Strong consumer finances should reboot retail spending

Strong labor markets with improving wages should reboot consumer spending. Adding to that strength, their financial position substantially improved since the global financial crisis (see figures 5 and 6). Despite all these positive trends, the question still remains, will consumers open their wallets. The recent improvement in the university of Michigan consumer sentiment and expectations indices suggest the increasing possibility they will reach into their wallets to spend (see figure 7 and 8.)

Figure 5

Household debt to GDP for United States

Figure 6

Household debt service payments as a percent of disposable income

Figure 7

U Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index

Source: The Daily Shot

 

Figure 8

U Michigan Consumer Expectations Index

Source: The Daily Shot

 

Ending the trade war – business investment could rebound later in the year

The continuing trade war resulted in the building of fourth quarter inventories to offset threatened January tariff increases. The holdover effect from the working down of inventories will depress first quarter GDP growth. The Atlanta Fed’s “GDP now” quarterly forecast estimates reduced private inventory levels will shed roughly 0.6% from first quarter growth.

A survey from The Wall Street Journal/Vistage Small Business CEO Survey  showed a third of CEO’s businesses negatively impacted by higher tariffs (see figure 9). At the same time, their confidence seems somewhat improved (see figure 10–the graph should read January 2019). With the growing likelihood of a trade war settlement sometime early in the spring, business optimism may regain strength at that time to the benefit of capital spending later in 2019. At this time, the decline in small business expenditure plans seem to be bottoming (see figure 11.) All of this potential awaits a trade war settlement.

Figure 9

Proportion of businesses negatively impacted by tariffs

Source:  The Wall Street Journal/Small Business Survey (February 2019)

 

Figure 10

The Wall Street Journal/Vistage Small Business CEO Confidence Index

Source: The Wall Street Journal/Vistage Small Business CEO Survey

 

Figure 11

Capital expenditure plans—small business (% planning a capital expenditure during the next 3-6 months)

Source: National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)

 

Investment conclusions

Some economists and well-known fund managers express concern about a modestly growing probability of recessionary forces showing up later this year. From our perspective, there seems little excesses in the traditional economy at present to come to that conclusion. In our view, a potential recession would more likely come from financial market instability than the economy itself. This small possibility might result from the significant level of corporate debt refunding coming due beginning in 2021.

In the meantime, with a shortage of growth, stocks of companies that can show steady above average growth through this period should benefit. With rising labor costs possibly squeezing profit margins, revenue growth will be more important to produce earnings growth. If the overhanging uncertainties from the trade war can be lessened or removed, the possibility exists that the economy could show some, modest upside surprises in the second half of the year. With continuing uncertainties from the trade war, an equally balanced portfolio of equities, alternative investments, and short duration fixed income securities seems appropriate at this time.

 

Andrew J. Melnick, CFA

Chief Investment Strategist

First Capital Investment Partners

 

First Capital Advisors Group, LLC is a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. First Capital Advisors Group, LLC, form Adv part 2a & 2b can be obtained by written request directly to: First Capital Advisors Group, LLC 512 east township road, 5 valley plaza, bluebell, pa 19422. This is prepared for informational purposes only. It does not address specific investment objectives nor is the content intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Although taken from reliable sources, First Capital Advisors cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information received from third parties.
The S&P 500 Index  is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest U.S. publicly traded companies by market value, The index is widely regarded as the best single gauge of large-cap U.S. equities.
ATA Truck Tonnage Index- The truck tonnage index is an index that measures the gross tonnage of freight which is transported by motor carriers in the United States for a given month. The index serves as an indicator of shipping activity and consumption of goods in the U.S. Analysts also use the truck tonnage index to determine the state of the U.S. economy as over 70-percent of all freight tonnage is via truck.
3/19/19
« Previous     Next »